About Clubhouse STUD Formula Official Website
We scanned studperformance.com for several indicators, and the picture here is genuinely mixed between some real, checkable positives and some significant red flags.
On the positive side, this page links to an actual, dated third-party Certificate of Analysis (COA) document hosted on Amazon S3, verifying batch testing for contaminants and nutrient content, something most products in this review series only claim without linking any supporting document. The page also provides a real US phone number, email, and a physical return address (285 Northeast Ave, Tallmadge, OH 44278) for its return policy, more concrete contact detail than most funnels offer.
On the concerning side, the page’s footer stacks three different, conflicting “retailer of this product” disclaimers, ClickBank, BuyGoods, and Digistore24, all claiming that role in the same document, plus leftover Arabic-language disclaimer text referring to an entirely unrelated weight-loss product called “SeroBurn.” This is the same kind of recycled-template contamination found on an unrelated product elsewhere in this series, strong evidence this page was built from a shared, poorly customized funnel template. The creator’s stated academic credential, a chemistry degree from “the University of Western Perth,” also doesn’t match any real institution, the actual universities offering chemistry in Perth, Australia are the University of Western Australia, Curtin University, and Edith Cowan University, none of which go by that name.
| Positive Reviews | Negative Reviews |
|---|---|
| Links to an actual, dated third-party lab Certificate of Analysis document, unusually concrete verification for this category | Footer stacks three different, conflicting retailer disclaimers (ClickBank, BuyGoods, Digistore24) in the same document |
| Provides a real phone number, email, and physical return address | Contains leftover Arabic-language disclaimer text for an unrelated weight-loss product (“SeroBurn”), evidence of a recycled funnel template |
| 180-day money-back guarantee, a generous refund window | The creator’s stated academic credential (“University of Western Perth”) doesn’t match any real institution |
I’ve reviewed a lot of men’s performance supplements, and Clubhouse STUD Formula is a genuinely mixed case: it backs its manufacturing claims with an actual linked lab document, rare in this category, while also showing clear signs of a recycled sales funnel and an unverifiable personal credential. Before buying, it’s worth separating the real verification from the parts of the page that don’t hold up to a closer look.
Is Clubhouse STUD Formula legit? This analysis looks at the ingredients, what’s independently checkable, and where the page’s own claims don’t line up.
What is Clubhouse STUD Formula?
Clubhouse STUD Formula is a men’s sexual performance supplement marketed around increasing “staying power” during intercourse, framed as balancing two amino acid-related brain chemicals, glutamate and GABA, through a blend of six named nutrients.
- Format: Capsules, two taken daily
- Price: $59 for one bottle, down to $39/bottle on the 6-bottle package (plus shipping on smaller orders)
- Regulatory Status: Dietary supplement, not FDA-approved as a medication; the page includes a standard FDA disclaimer
Key Ingredients Used in Clubhouse STUD Formula
The official site names six specific ingredients:
- Rhodiola Rosea Extract – an adaptogenic herb; the page cites a specific 2016 study associating it with improved performance, though the direct link to that exact study isn’t included among the page’s own reference list
- Methylfolate (active Vitamin B9) – cited alongside a specific 2014 study on ejaculatory control, also not directly linked in the reference list
- Taurine – an amino acid involved in GABA production
- Magnesium Glycinate – marketed for reducing stress hormones
- L-Theanine – marketed for increasing GABA and reducing overthinking
- Methylcobalamin (active Vitamin B12) – marketed for reducing stress and increasing energy
These are all real, identifiable nutrients with general research behind their individual roles in relaxation and stress response. The gap is between naming specific studies in the marketing text and actually linking to them, only two general references appear in the page’s own bibliography, neither directly matching the specific named studies cited for Rhodiola or Methylfolate.
How Clubhouse STUD Formula Is Marketed to Work
The core claim is that optimizing the balance between glutamate (described as an “excitatory” chemical) and GABA (described as a “calming” chemical) increases sexual stamina, and that modern processed food, specifically MSG, disrupts this balance.
Worth noting: glutamate and GABA are real neurotransmitters with genuine roles in nervous system regulation, and the general concept of relaxation-promoting nutrients supporting stress response isn’t fabricated. But the specific claim that MSG intake is a primary driver of sexual performance issues, and that this particular six-nutrient combination reliably corrects it, goes well beyond what the two references provided on the page actually support.
Clubhouse STUD Formula: What’s Claimed as Benefits
Based on the official site, the stated benefits are:
- Increased Sexual Stamina – the central marketed outcome
- Reduced Performance Anxiety – framed as a byproduct of the calming effect of optimized GABA
- Natural, Stimulant-Free Formula – no reported synthetic or toxic ingredients
- Discreet Packaging – shipped in plain packaging
- Long Refund Window – 180 days, longer than most competitors
Clubhouse STUD Formula Cons
Before buying, there are real concerns worth weighing.
- Recycled Funnel Evidence: leftover Arabic-language disclaimer text for an unrelated weight-loss product, plus three conflicting retailer disclaimers, both point to a poorly customized, reused sales page template.
- Unverifiable Academic Credential: the creator’s stated chemistry degree from “University of Western Perth” doesn’t match any real institution in Perth, Australia.
- Named Studies Aren’t Directly Linked: specific researchers and years are cited for several ingredients, but the page’s own reference list doesn’t include direct links to those exact studies.
- Heavy Reliance on Unverifiable Personal Testimonials: the sales narrative leans on detailed, specific personal stories that can’t be independently confirmed.
- Standard Inflated Price Anchors: “regular price” figures crossed out next to sale prices follow the same pattern used throughout this product category.
Is Clubhouse STUD Formula a Scam?
This is a genuinely mixed case rather than a clear-cut one in either direction.
What’s worth weighing:
- The linked, dated Certificate of Analysis is real, concrete verification that most competitors in this category don’t provide
- The real contact information and return address are more transparent than many anonymous funnels
- The recycled-template evidence (mismatched retailer disclaimers, leftover unrelated product text) suggests this specific page wasn’t built with full care or customization
- The creator’s specific academic credential doesn’t check out against real institutions
If you’re considering this product, the manufacturing verification (the linked COA) is a genuine positive worth weighing against the page’s sloppier elements. Treat the specific named-study citations as unconfirmed until you can find the exact papers referenced, and don’t put weight on the stated academic credential as currently described.
Conclusion
Looking at Clubhouse STUD Formula overall, it’s a supplement that backs its manufacturing claims with more concrete, checkable documentation (a linked lab Certificate of Analysis, real contact details) than most products in this review series.
That’s undercut by real evidence of a recycled, poorly customized sales funnel, conflicting retailer disclaimers, leftover unrelated product text, and a specific academic credential that doesn’t match any real institution.
Before buying, weigh the genuine positives (the lab document, the contact information, the refund window) against these specific, checkable gaps, and don’t take the named research citations at face value without finding the actual papers yourself.
